Compared with doing it yourself

Nobody knows your business better, and it costs nothing but time. Time is the problem: the tests you meant to start and the budget you meant to move wait until you have a free hour.

Join the beta Try the live demo

One situation, two ways

A busy Monday with two ads that overpromise

Two coffee ads said “The healthiest coffee you can drink” and “Guilt-free coffee for better mornings”. The brand’s guidelines say never to make health claims.

Yourself

Written in a hurry between other jobs, ads like these run until a customer, a platform reviewer or you on a quieter day notices.

Heraldic

Banned phrases stopped both before they ran, and brand review rewrote them around the roast date: “Roasted Monday, at your door by Thursday.” Rewrites are within its permissions, so it made them and told you.

What it does well

Doing it yourself has real advantages: you know your customers, margins and stock, there’s no one to brief or pay, and you can change course fast. But the work that compounds is daily checking, testing and moving money, and spare moments rarely come daily.

You know the customers, the margins and the stock.
No one to brief and no one to pay.
You can change course the moment you decide to.

Where it stops

1It happens when there’s time, which is rarely every day.
2Knowing whether a test worked takes statistics and patience.
3Your limits hold only as long as you remember to check them.
4The reasoning lives in your head.

Side by side, with cost and time.

Doing it yourself compared with Heraldic, row by row
Question	Doing it yourself	Heraldic
Stops at your limits	When you’re watching	Checked by software before every change, and again on approval
Explains itself	Your memory	A record of every action, with its reason
Who sets the limits	You, when you remember	You, and the software holds them
What it optimizes	Whatever you have time to check	Your conversion events, each valued by what it’s worth to you
Across channels	One tab at a time	One set of rules, one contact policy, one record
Video and large-scale creative	Whatever you can make	Still images from your approved library; video you upload sits beside them
Holds your credentials	You do	Agents never do. Only the executor, the part that makes changes, holds them
What it costs	Your time, every day it gets done.	Not set yet. Ad spend goes straight to the ad platforms
Time to a first result	As soon as you start, and as often as you find the time.	Set by your funnel: at a store with daily orders, a test can be called in two weeks; a lead-generation funnel takes longer.

When to choose it instead

If your spend is small enough that there’s little to learn from it. Agents need enough volume to judge results, and their reports say when there isn’t enough.

Using both

You stay in charge: your briefs, your limits, your approvals. Agents do the checking you don’t have time for, and you can still work in your own accounts.

Questions about this comparison

How much of my time will it take?

Reading reports and deciding what’s in your inbox. Stricter permission levels mean more to decide; looser ones mean more to read.

What if my spend is small?

Agents need enough volume to judge results. With little volume, they act less often, steer by earlier steps in your funnel, and say “too early to call” instead of guessing.

Can I still change things myself?

Yes. Your accounts stay yours. Tell the agent what you changed, in a sentence, and its next plan takes it into account.

Other comparisons

Stop being the only one who checks.

Join the beta, or try the demo first.

Or try the live demo first